MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Bilateral Extensor Hallucis Longus Minor: A Case Report

2008· article· en· W30785769 on OpenAlexaff
Calin Lucaciu, Sarah Hockley

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFoot and Ankle Surgery
Canadian institutionsCanadian Memorial Chiropractic College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnatomyMedicineTendonMuscle bellyAnkleCadaverDorsumInterosseous membraneProximal phalanxFlexor Digitorum LongusSurgeryUlna

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This case report describes a bilateral variation in the origin and distal attachment of the extensor hallucis longus (EHL) muscle, whereby a secondary distinct muscle belly and tendon are present in an adult human cadaver – Extensor Hallucis Longus Minor (EHLM). EHLM originates from the interosseus membrane just medial to, and at the same level as, the origin of Fibularis Tertius. The muscle is unipennate and descends through the anterior tarsal tunnel between the tendons of Extensor Hallucis Longus (EHL) and Extensor Digitorum Longus (EDL). At the level of the dorsal surface of the navicular bone, the muscle fibers converge into a tendon (4 mm in width, 13 mm in length) that joins the tendon of Extensor Hallucis Brevis (EHB). The united tendon of EHLM and EHB courses just lateral to the tendon of EHL and attaches onto the dorsal aspect of the proximal phalanx of great toe. EHLM is innervated by two branches of the deep fibular nerve, originating 5 cm and 8 cm superior to the bimaleolar line. EHLM is analyzed from the perspective of: 1) proper identification through the use of MRI and CT scans; 2) clinical implications related to the anterior tarsal syndrome; 3) biomechanics of the great toe; 4) entrapment of the deep fibular nerve at the level of dorsum of the foot; 5) in the lateral ankle stabilization surgery as an alternative flap muscle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.753

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicFoot and Ankle SurgeryFrench-language works237,207