MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3080147306 · doi:10.1093/noajnl/vdaa103

Clinical and molecular characterization of a multi-institutional cohort of pediatric spinal cord low-grade gliomas

2020· article· en· W3080147306 on OpenAlex
Sydney Grob, Liana Nobre, Kristen Campbell, Kurtis D. Davies, Scott Ryall, Dara L. Aisner, Lindsey M. Hoffman, Shadi Zahedi, Andrew Morin, Michele Crespo, Anandani Nellan, Adam L. Green, Nicholas K. Foreman, Rajeev Vibhakar, Todd C. Hankinson, Michael H. Handler, Cynthia Hawkins, Uri Tabori, Bette K. Kleinschmidt‐DeMasters, Jean M. Mulcahy Levy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology Advances · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick Children
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeBrain Tumour CharityNational Institutes of HealthMorgan Adams Foundation
KeywordsCDKN2AFluorescence in situ hybridizationMedicineInterquartile rangeFusion geneOncologyPDGFRAPathologyCancer researchCohortInternal medicineGeneBiologyCancerGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The mitogen-activated protein kinases/extracelluar signal-regulated kinases pathway is involved in cell growth and proliferation, and mutations in BRAF have made it an oncogene of interest in pediatric cancer. Previous studies found that BRAF mutations as well as KIAA1549–BRAF fusions are common in intracranial low-grade gliomas (LGGs). Fewer studies have tested for the presence of these genetic changes in spinal LGGs. The aim of this study was to better understand the prevalence of BRAF and other genetic aberrations in spinal LGG. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 46 spinal gliomas from patients aged 1–25 years from Children’s Hospital Colorado (CHCO) and The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids). CHCO utilized a 67-gene panel that assessed BRAF and additionally screened for other possible genetic abnormalities of interest. At SickKids, BRAFV600E was assessed by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry. BRAF fusions were detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, or NanoString platform. Data were correlated with clinical information. Results Of 31 samples with complete fusion analysis, 13 (42%) harbored KIAA1549–BRAF. All 13 (100%) patients with confirmed KIAA1549–BRAF survived the entirety of the study period (median [interquartile range] follow-up time: 47 months [27–85 months]) and 15 (83.3%) fusion-negative patients survived (follow-up time: 37.5 months [19.8–69.5 months]). Other mutations of interest were also identified in this patient cohort including BRAFV600E, PTPN11, H3F3A, TP53, FGFR1, and CDKN2A deletion. Conclusion KIAA1549–BRAF was seen in higher frequency than BRAFV600E or other genetic aberrations in pediatric spinal LGGs and experienced lower death rates compared to KIAA1549–BRAF negative patients, although this was not statistically significant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.187
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it