MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3080170233 · doi:10.1002/edn3.129

Fine‐scale environmental heterogeneity shapes fluvial fish communities as revealed by eDNA metabarcoding

2020· article· en· W3080170233 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental DNA · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Ressources naturelles et des ForêtsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs
KeywordsEnvironmental DNABiodiversityAbundance (ecology)EcologySpatial ecologyRelative species abundanceFluvialEnvironmental scienceGeographyFisheryBiologyStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Conservation of freshwater biodiversity requires being able to track the presence and abundance of entire fish communities. However, studying fish community composition within rivers remains a technical challenge because of high spatial and temporal physico‐chemical variability, anthropic activities and connections with other river catchments, which may all contribute to important variations in local ecology and communities. Here, we used environmental DNA metabarcoding to document spatial variation in fish communities at a small geographic scale in a large river system. The study was conducted in the Contrecoeur sector (5.5 km long and approximately 1–1.5 km wide) of the St. Lawrence River (Québec, Canada), where two water masses with different physico‐chemical properties, known as "brown waters" and "green waters," flow in parallel with limited admixing. Water samples were collected during two consecutive days at 53 stations located in both water masses. Using universal PCR MiFish 12S primers, Illumina MiSeq sequencing, and the Barque ( www.github.com/enormandeau/barque ) eDNA analysis software developed by our group, a total of 67 fish species were detected. PERMANOVA and redundancy analyses (RDA) performed on relative read abundance revealed that each water mass comprised distinct communities that depended on turbidity, depth, and to a lesser extent on the upstream versus downstream position along the study area. eDNA metabarcoding results were compared with those of traditional surveys conducted previously in the sector and up to 40 km upstream of it. As previously reported, higher species diversity was detected by eDNA and with substantially lower sampling effort. Our results represent one of the few studies documenting the potential of eDNA metabarcoding to investigate small‐scale variation in 2D spatial patterns of distribution of whole fish communities associated with habitat characteristics within a lotic system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.124
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it