Information municipale et lecture citoyenne : hors-normes et normalité des processus interprétatifs dans des textes ouverts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'information municipale est approche du point de vue de l'interprtation empirique, en termes de lecture citoyenne, une reconstruction de sens d'extraits de procs-verbaux, avis publics ou encore communiqus, manifestant la participation discursive des lecteurs au sens des informations vhicules. L'articulation la problmatique du hors-normes repose sur le reprage et l'identification de stratgies interprtatives qui rvlent, particulirement selon le modle de comprhension intgration de Kintsch et Van Dijk, une expression des connaissances, valeurs, expriences, logiques de pense des lecteurs-compreneurs la base de texte. Nos observations conduisent notamment restituer aux lectures citoyennes de ces crits professionnels, le caractre transitoire allou aux textes littraires hors-normes, car la part hors-normes des stratgies de reconstruction de sens relve d'une logique sociocognitive narrative o la dnomination des acteurs, des actions, de leurs motifs et incidences permettrait aux citoyens de questionner la pertinence sociopolitique des dcisions. O le hors-normes des discours interprts s'inscrirait dans le genre et prsagerait quelque changement possible au pallier de gestion politique le plus proche des citoyens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".