Metabolomic analysis coupled with extreme phenotype sampling identified that lysophosphatidylcholines are associated with multisite musculoskeletal pain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Musculoskeletal pain often occurs simultaneously at multiple anatomical sites. The aim of the study was to identify metabolic biomarkers for multisite musculoskeletal pain (MSMP) by metabolomics with an extreme phenotype sampling strategy. The study participants (n = 610) were derived from the Newfoundland Osteoarthritis Study. Musculoskeletal pain was assessed using a self-reported pain questionnaire where painful sites were circled on a manikin by participants and the total number of painful sites were calculated. Targeted metabolomic profiling on fasting plasma samples was performed using the Biocrates AbsoluteIDQ p180 kit. Plasma cytokine concentrations including tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6, interleukin-1β, and macrophage migration inhibitory factor were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Data on blood cholesterol profiles were retrieved from participants' medical records. Demographic, anthropological, and clinical information was self-reported. The number of reported painful sites ranged between 0 and 21. Two hundred and five participants were included in the analysis comprising 83 who had ≥7 painful sites and 122 who had ≤1 painful site. Women and younger people were more likely to have MSMP (P ≤ 0.02). Multisite musculoskeletal pain was associated with a higher risk of having incontinence, worse functional status and longer period of pain, and higher levels of low-density lipoprotein and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (all P ≤ 0.03). Among the 186 metabolites measured, 2 lysophosphatidylcholines, 1 with 26 carbons with no double bond and 1 with 28 carbons with 1 double bond, were significantly and positively associated with MSMP after adjusting for multiple testing with the Bonferroni method (P ≤ 0.0001) and could be considered as novel metabolic markers for MSMP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".