Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article is an attempt to understand the meanings of “hand” in the postmodern/posthuman world by reading two love stories written by an English writer/artist D. H. Lawrence (1885-1930) and a Canadian short-story writer Alice Munro (1931-): “You Touched Me” and “Hateship, Friendship, Courtship, Loveship, Marriage.” At the core of these stories hands play an important role in deconstruction of human relations by awakening what Walter Benjamin puts “the old co-ordination of the soul, the eye, and the hand” in his 1936 essay “The Storyteller.” Reading the short stories vis-a-vie Benjamin’s theory of narratives and visual arts, love can be seen as a construction whose place is formed not in “homogenous and empty” aura, but in that which is fulfilled by the instant and sensual body living in here-and-now. Hands that touch each other symbolize no more than the opening of body toward the unknown and nameless other and perhaps one of the scarce resources to remain truly human in the posthuman era.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".