MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Phase Ib dose finding trial of intravenous panobinostat with docetaxel in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)

2009· article· en· W3080835754 on OpenAlexaff
Dana E. Rathkopf, K. N., Ulka N. Vaishampayan, Sebastién J. Hotte, N. Vogelzang, Joshi J. Alumkal, Manish Agrawal, Timothy Nydam, Abderrahim Fandi, Howard I. Scher

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHistone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
Canadian institutionsJuravinski Cancer CentreBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePanobinostatDocetaxelProstate cancerInternal medicineNeutropeniaCohortFebrile neutropeniaClinical endpointAdverse effectOncologyCancerChemotherapyClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

5064 Background: Panobinostat (LBH589) is a potent pan-deacetylase inhibitor that has demonstrated activity in both in vivo and in vitro prostate cancer models. Methods: An open-label, multicenter, dose-finding trial of i.v. panobinostat given on Days 1 and 8 (10, 15, and 20 mg/m2) with fixed-dose docetaxel on Day 1 (75 mg/m2) and prednisone (5 mg bid) in a 21-day cycle is being conducted in chemotherapy-naïve patients (pts) with CRPC. All pts have adequate organ function and ECOG performance status (PS) < 1. Pts with significant cardiovascular abnormalities or QTcF >450 msec on screening ECG are excluded. This treatment is continued until disease progression or intolerability. The primary endpoint is determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of i.v. panobinostat in combination with docetaxel using the Bayesian logistic regression model. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) are defined in first cycle. Results: Twenty-one pts (Cohort 1, n = 8; Cohort 2, n = 10; Cohort 3, n = 3) have been treated, with a median age of 66 yrs (range 50–88), median Gleason score of 9 (range 7–9), and median entry PSA of 67.1 (range 1.3–7920). DLTs include: Gr 4 bradycardia in Cohort 1 (n = 1) and Gr 4 neutropenia, resulting in Day 8 panobinostat dose omission (Cohort 2, n = 2; Cohort 3, n = 1). Gr 3/4 adverse events (AEs) include: neutropenia (n = 12), febrile neutropenia (n = 3), dizziness (n = 2), DVT (n = 1). Other Gr 1 or 2 AEs include: thrombocytopenia (n = 4), fatigue (n = 10), alopecia (n = 7), diarrhea, nausea, and rash (n = 5). Among the 599 ECGs, there was 1 QTcF increase of >60 ms from baseline and no QTcF >480 ms. Preliminary Cohort 1 pharmacokinetic (PK) data shows the mean panobinostat AUC0-inf does not differ between Day 1 (239 ng*hr/mL ) and Day 8 (254 ng*hr/mL), and the mean clearance value appeared to be similar between Days 1 and 8. In Cohort 1, the median number of cycles was 6. Four of 8 pts received >6 cycles. Five and four pts had >30% and >50% PSA reduction from baseline, respectively. In Cohort 2, 9 of 10 pts are still on treatment after 3 cycles. Conclusions: The combination of panobinostat at 10 or 15 mg/m2 with docetaxel is feasible and to date no PK interaction is apparent. Full safety, efficacy, and PK results will be presented. Under DOD PCCTC. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.388 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicHistone Deacetylase Inhibitors ResearchFrench-language works237,207