MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3080976459 · doi:10.1177/0954405420949127

Evaluating the sensitivity of acoustic emission signal features to the variation of cutting parameters in milling aluminum alloys: Part A: frequency domain analysis

2020· article· en· W3080976459 on OpenAlex
Mohamad Javad Anahid, Hoda Heydarnia, Seyed Ali Niknam, Hedayeh Mehmanparast

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B Journal of Engineering Manufacture · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced machining processes and optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityPolytechnique MontréalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcoustic emissionSIGNAL (programming language)Time domainAcousticsSignal processingFrequency domainSensitivity (control systems)Materials scienceCutting toolChip formationMachiningComputer scienceEngineeringElectronic engineeringTool wearPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is known that adequate knowledge of the sensitivity of acoustic emission signal parameters to various experimental parameters is indispensable. According to the review of the literature, a lack of knowledge was noticeable concerning the behavior of acoustic emission parameters under a broad range of machining parameters. This becomes more visible in milling operations that include sophisticated chip formation morphology and significant interaction effects and directional pressures and forces. To remedy the aforementioned lack of knowledge, the effect of the variation of cutting parameters on the time and frequency features of acoustic emission signals, extracted and computed from the milling operation, needs to be investigated in a wide aspect. The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of cutting parameters including the feed rate, cutting speed, depth of cut, material properties, as well as cutting tool coating/insert nose radius on computed acoustic emission signals featured in the frequency domain. Similar studies on time-domain signal features were already conducted. To conduct appropriate signal processing and feature extraction, a signal segmentation and processing approach is proposed based on dividing the recorded acoustic emission signals into three sections with specific signal durations associated with cutting tool movement within the work part. To define the sensitive acoustic emission parameters to the variation of cutting parameters, advanced signal processing and statistical approaches were used. Despite the time features of acoustic emission signals, frequency domain acoustic emission parameters seem to be insensitive to the variation of cutting parameters. Moreover, cutting factors governing the effectiveness of acoustic emission signal parameters are hinted. Among these, the cutting speed and feed rate seem to have the most noticeable effects on the variation of time–frequency domain acoustic emission signal information, respectively. The outcomes of this work, along with recently completed works in the time domain, can be integrated into advanced classification and artificial intelligence approaches for numerous applications, including real-time machining process monitoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.439
Threshold uncertainty score0.563

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it