MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Five-year relapse-free survival and predictors of relapse following preoperative docetaxel and mitoxantrone for high-risk localized prostate cancer

2009· article· en· W3081165226 on OpenAlexaff
Brooks L. Rademacher, Mark Garzotto, C. S. Higano, Catherine O′Brien, Nicole Janeba, L. Fazli, P.H. Lange, Shari Lieberman, Tomasz M. Beer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsVancouver General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDocetaxelMitoxantroneProstatectomyProstate cancerInternal medicineOncologyClinical endpointUrologyRegimenCancerFebrile neutropeniaProstateChemotherapyNeutropeniaClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

5121 Background: Efforts to incorporate systemic therapy with activity against castration-resistant prostate cancer into the early management of high-risk disease are motivated by persistent risk of relapse when neoadjuvant androgen suppression therapy (AST) is combined with surgery. As docetaxel and mitoxantrone exert anti-tumor effects through distinct cellular mechanisms, this combination has the potential for synergistic activity against prostate cancer. Here we report the 5-year outcomes of patients treated with a novel regimen that combines these agents without AST prior to prostatectomy. We also examined pathologic, biomarker and clinical predictors of early relapse. Methods: 57 high-risk prostate cancer patients were enrolled in a phase I/II study of weekly docetaxel 35 mg/m2 and escalating mitoxantrone to 4 mg/m2 delivered weekly for 3 of every 4 weeks per cycle for 4 cycles over 16 weeks followed by radical prostatectomy. A tissue micro-array constructed from the prostatectomy specimens served to facilitate the exploratory evaluation of biomarkers. The primary end point was relapse-free survival. Relapse was defined as a confirmed serum PSA > 0.4 ng/mL. Results: 54 of 57 pts received all 4 cycles of docetaxel and mitoxantrone prior to radical prostatectomy. Grade 4 toxicities were limited to leucopenia, neutropenia and hyperglycemia. Serum testosterone levels remained stable after chemotherapy. Negative surgical margins were attained in 67% of cases. Lymph node involvement was detected in 18.5% of cases. With a median follow-up of 63 months (range 7 to 86 months), 27 of 57 (47.4%) patients recurred. The Kaplan-Meier progression-free survival at 2 years was 65.5% (95% CI 53.0% to 78.0%) and 49.8% at 5 years (95% CI 35.5% to 64.1%). Pretreatment serum PSA, lymph node involvement, and post-chemotherapy tissue VEGF expression were independent predictors of early relapse. Conclusions: Preoperative combination chemotherapy with docetaxel and mitoxantrone is safe. Approximately half of the high risk pts remain relapse free at 5 years and clinical and molecular predictors of early relapse in this population have been identified. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→