Cervical Radiculopathy Associated With Shingles Herpes Zoster Infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This case reports discusses the case of a 43-year-old man with concurrent cervical spine radiculopathy and herpes zoster shingles infection. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 43-year-old man with left sided C6 radiculopathy was seen and treated for the clinical diagnosis of C5-C6 disc herniation. Ten days before seeking care he had received influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations. A week after vaccination, he noticed tingling, aching, and fatigue in his left arm. A week later, a rash appeared on his left arm. This was diagnosed via Teladoc as shingles; ibuprofen was prescribed, as too much time had elapsed for antiviral medication. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME: Chiropractic spinal manipulation using Cox distraction protocols for a C5-C6 disc herniation was given 5 times over a time period of 5 weeks. This treatment resolved the patient's left arm pain, provided 50% relief for his neck pain, and decreased his left arm rash. Four spinal manipulations were given over the next 12-week period, resulting in 80% reduced neck pain, complete resolution of left arm pain, and faint herpetic rash. The patient stated that he felt he had returned to his level of health before the incident. CONCLUSION: Concurrent upper extremity radicular pain accompanied by herpes zoster cutaneous rash is described. Chiropractic spinal manipulation using Cox spinal distraction protocols saw resolution of the patient's complaints. Considered to be an uncommon dual occurrence, radiculopathy and herpes zoster infection deserve clinical discussion and evaluation of treatment protocols.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".