MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Editorial Comment: Flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy with regional anesthesia vs general anesthesia: A prospective randomized study

2020· editorial· en· W3081282268 on OpenAlexaff
John D. Denstedt

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational braz j urol · 2020
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUreteroscopyLithotripsyRandomized controlled trialLaser lithotripsySurgeryAnesthesiaKidney stonesFluoroscopyLocal anesthesiaUreter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors report on results of a randomized prospective trial in comparable groups of patients with intrarenal stones treated by flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy (1). Patients were randomized to either general or regional epidural anesthesia with the primary outcome measures being surgeon comfort and other standard measureable results of fURS treatment. After exclusions or intraoperative conversion to general anesthesia or PCNL, 45 patients in the RA group were compared to 61 in the GA group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational braz j urolSame topicKidney Stones and Urolithiasis TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207