Effects of diatoms on erosion and accretion processes in saltmarsh inferred from field observations of hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Microphytobenthos influence sediment dynamics via their growth and covering on the surface sediment of saltmarshes. To understand the sediment transport and morphological changes resulting from microphytobenthos in a saltmarsh, two parallelly located sites were established to measure the hydrodynamic forces, sediment characteristics and microphytobenthos properties both in winter and summer. Diatoms were not observed at any of the two sites in winter because of their growth cycles. In summer, however, diatoms were found in both sites, with a chlorophyll a (Chl‐a) concentration of 4.1 μg/g in the surficial sediment at the unvegetated site and a Chl‐a concentration of 1.4 μg/g at the vegetated site. Interactions between diatoms and fine particle accumulation induced positive feedbacks between the seabed stable states and the growth of diatoms. Furthermore, the critical erosion threshold value in the vegetated area was 0.33 N/m 2 , whereas the value in the adjacent unvegetated area reached up to 0.43 N/m 2 because of the dense diatom armouring in summer, which increased 50% and 126% critical erosion threshold values than those at the corresponding sites in winter. Consequently, net sediment accumulation occurred in the unvegetated area in summer but opposite to that in winter. These results reveal that high coverage of diatoms contributes to substantial impacts on bed erodibility and sedimentary processes, which is vital for the understanding of the morphological evolution in saltmarshes, and provide valuable suggestions for coastal saltmarsh reconstruction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".