MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fourier-Laplace Spectral Theory for Non-Steady-State Thermal Fields with Applications to Problems in Steady-State Photothermal Linear Frequency Modulation

2020· article· en· W3081315273 on OpenAlexafffund
Andreas Mandelis, Xinxin Guo

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Applied · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsOpticsFrequency modulationFourier transformExcitationFrequency domainWaveformThermalSteady state (chemistry)PhysicsModulation (music)Microscale chemistryMaterials scienceComputational physicsAcousticsRadio frequencyMathematicsTelecommunicationsChemistryQuantum mechanicsMathematical analysisComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The spectral theory of thermal fields subject to arbitrary boundary surface flux conditions developed in this work establishes a universal approach to non-steady-state (photo)thermal responses of solids under transient or modulated thermal excitation through a combined Fourier-Laplace formalism. The self-consistent evolution from the nonsteady state to the steady state under single frequency or arbitrary pulsed or multifrequency thermal-wave excitation waveforms allows for defining experimental criteria in terms of excitation waveform repetition periods to attain steady state in frequency-modulated photothermal (and other general experimental) systems. This approach is crucial for ensuring accurate material property measurements using lock-in or correlation and spectral analysis demodulation of thermal waves, especially under linear frequency modulation (LFM) when the modulated steady state is time dependent. The theory is validated using experimental photothermal radiometry LFM responses from black anodized aluminum. We also define the associated thermal diffusion length in terms of linear superpositions of partial thermal waves (wavelets), which are shown to result in improved depth, lateral, and axial resolution in thermal-wave radar imaging applications compared with sequential single-modulation frequency detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review AppliedSame topicThermography and Photoacoustic TechniquesFrench-language works237,207