MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3081317109 · doi:10.1002/gj.3963

The hydrocarbon generation and expulsion features of source rocks and tight oil potential of the second member of the Qiketai Formation, Shengbei area in the Turpan–Hami Basin, <scp>NW</scp> China

2020· article· en· W3081317109 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSource rockKerogenHydrocarbonGeologyStructural basinGeochemistryMineralogyTight oilTotal organic carbonOil shaleChemistryGeomorphologyPaleontologyEnvironmental chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significant progress in tight oil exploration has been reported in the second member of the Qiketai Formation (J 2 q 2 ) in the Shengbei area of the Turpan–Hami Basin. Geochemical analyses were conducted to assess the quality of the J 2 q 2 source rocks. The improved hydrocarbon generation potential method was utilized to quantify the hydrocarbon generation and expulsion features of the source rocks. The results showed that J 2 q 2 source rocks were deposited in a reduced lacustrine setting with a high palaeoproductivity. The J 2 q 2 source rocks are widely distributed (approximately 1,000 km 2 ) and have a thickness that varies from 50 to 130 m. Moreover, they can be identified as a set of high‐quality source rocks (thermally mature rocks with R o values &gt;0.5%, consisting mainly of types I and II kerogen and possessing an average total organic carbon content of 2.68%). The oil–source correlation results reveal that the source of crude oil in the studied area is J 2 q 2 . The improved hydrocarbon generation potential method is established for different kerogen types to limit the influence of the kerogen type on the calculation. The hydrocarbon expulsion threshold of the type I model is located at R o = 0.6%. The type II kerogen rocks have different characteristics, and the hydrocarbon expulsion threshold is located at R o = 0.62%. The maximum hydrocarbon generation and expulsion intensities are 700 × 10 4 t/km 2 and 400 × 10 4 t/km 2 , respectively. The hydrocarbon generation and expulsion amount of the J 2 q 2 source rocks are 21.4 × 10 8 t and 12.3 × 10 8 t, respectively. The tight oil potential of the J 2 q 2 tight oil in the Shengbei area is 4.09 × 10 8 t. The SB10 and SB6 well areas are favourable J 2 q 2 tight oil exploration areas in the Shengbei area. The SB10 well area has the highest hydrocarbon generation and expulsion intensities in the study area and is the best tight oil exploration target.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.207

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it