MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3081496661 · doi:10.1093/imrn/rnab026

The Formal Shift Operator on the Yangian Double

2021· article· en· W3081496661 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Mathematics Research Notices · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPolynomial and algebraic computation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsYangianHomomorphismAlgebra over a fieldAlgebra homomorphismIsomorphism (crystallography)Operator (biology)Hopf algebra

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Let ${\mathfrak{g}}$ be a symmetrizable Kac–Moody algebra with associated Yangian $Y_\hbar{\mathfrak{g}}$ and Yangian double $\textrm{D}Y_\hbar{\mathfrak{g}}$. An elementary result of fundamental importance to the theory of Yangians is that, for each $c\in{\mathbb{C}}$, there is an automorphism $\tau _c$ of $Y_\hbar{\mathfrak{g}}$ corresponding to the translation $t\mapsto t+c$ of the complex plane. Replacing $c$ by a formal parameter $z$ yields the so-called formal shift homomorphism $\tau _z$ from $Y_\hbar{\mathfrak{g}}$ to the polynomial algebra $Y_\hbar{\mathfrak{g}}[z]$. We prove that $\tau _z$ uniquely extends to an algebra homomorphism $\Phi _z$ from the Yangian double $\textrm{D}Y_\hbar{\mathfrak{g}}$ into the $\hbar $-adic closure of the algebra of Laurent series in $z^{-1}$ with coefficients in the Yangian $Y_\hbar{\mathfrak{g}}$. This induces, via evaluation at any point $c\in{\mathbb{C}}^\times $, a homomorphism from $\textrm{D}Y_\hbar{\mathfrak{g}}$ into the completion of the Yangian with respect to its grading. We show that each such homomorphism gives rise to an isomorphism between completions of $\textrm{D}Y_\hbar{\mathfrak{g}}$ and $Y_\hbar{\mathfrak{g}}$ and, as a corollary, we find that the Yangian $Y_\hbar{\mathfrak{g}}$ can be realized as a degeneration of the Yangian double $\textrm{D}Y_\hbar{\mathfrak{g}}$. Using these results, we obtain a Poincaré–Birkhoff–Witt theorem for $\textrm{D}Y_\hbar{\mathfrak{g}}$ applicable when ${\mathfrak{g}}$ is of finite type or of simply laced affine type.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Mathematics Research NoticesSame topicPolynomial and algebraic computationFrench-language works237,207