Notice of Violation of IEEE Publication Principles: Reversible Data Hiding and Smart Multimedia Computing Using Big Data in Remote Sensing Systems
Post-publication record
Source: Retraction Watch, joined by DOI. OpenAlex records retraction as is_retracted, a boolean over a state space with at least four values, so it cannot express an expression of concern, a correction or a reinstatement; it reports them as false, which reads as “fine”.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Notice of Violation of IEEE Publication Principles“Reversible Data Hiding and Smart Multimedia Computing Using Big Data in Remote Sensing Systems”by Rahul Malik, Aditya Khamparia, Sahil Garg, Deepak Gupta, Bong Jun Choi, M. Shamim Hossain in IEEE Access, Vol 8, August 2020, pp. 153546- 153560After careful and considered review of the content and authorship of this paper by a duly constituted expert committee, this paper has been found to be in violation of IEEE’s Publication Principles.This paper is a duplication of the original text from the paper cited below. The original text was copied without attribution (including appropriate references to the original author(s) and/or paper title) and without permission.“Big Data Geospatial Processing for Massive Aerial LiDAR Datasets”by David Deibe, Margarita Amor, and Ramón Doallo in Remote Sensing, MDPI, February 2020There is a need for improvement of tools to deal with large volumes of multimedia data effectively. In particular, real-time data processing is one of the major problems for multimedia data computing in remote sensing systems. Such big data systems have to offer effective management and computational efficiency for applications in real-time. In this paper, we propose a large-scale geological processing method for aerial Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) clouds containing multimedia data that ensures mobility and timeliness. By utilizing Spark and Cassandra, our proposed approach can significantly reduce the execution time of the time-consuming process. We investigate fast ground-only raster generation from huge LiDAR datasets. We observed that filtered cloud data ensuing from impartial consideration of neighboring zones could lead to classification errors on the boundaries. Therefore, an integrated approach is proposed to correct these errors to improve the classification consistency, achieve faster processing time, provide automatic error correction, obtain Digital Terrain Models (DTM), and minimize user intervention. These features can provide a framework for an on-demand DTM output and scalable application services. Furthermore, the proposed approach can expect to benefit other real-time applications in LiDAR systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.021 | 0.046 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.016 | 0.017 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.031 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".