MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3081706340 · doi:10.1101/2020.08.28.272914

Pathogenic Mechanisms Underlying Stargardt Macular Degeneration Linked to Mutations in the Transmembrane Domains of ABCA4

2020· preprint· en· W3081706340 on OpenAlexaff
Fabian A. Garces, Jéssica Fernandes Scortecci, Robert S. Molday

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinal Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsABCA4Stargardt diseaseMissense mutationTransmembrane domainTransmembrane proteinCell biologyBiologyATP-binding cassette transporterMutationBiochemistryGeneticsChemistryRetinalTransporterAmino acidPhenotypeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract ABCA4 is an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter predominantly expressed in photoreceptors where it transports the substrate N-retinylidene-phosphatidylethanolamine across disc membranes thereby facilitating the clearance of retinal compounds from photoreceptor outer segments. Loss of function mutations in ABCA4 cause the accumulation of bisretinoids leading to Stargardt disease (STGD1) and other retinopathies. In this study, we examined the expression and functional properties of ABCA4 harboring disease-causing missense mutations in the two transmembrane domains (TMDs) of ABCA4. Our results indicate that these mutations lead to protein misfolding, loss in substrate binding, decreased ATPase activity or a combination of these properties. Additionally, we identified an arginine (R653) in transmembrane segment 2 of ABCA4 as a residue essential for substrate binding and substrate-stimulated ATPase activity. The expression and functional activity of the TMD variants correlate well with the severity of STGD1. Our studies provide a basis for developing and evaluating novel treatments for STGD1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicRetinal Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207