A Composite Material Based Neural Network for Tissue Mechanical Properties Estimation Toward Stage Assessment of Infarction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cardiac biomechanical modelling is a promising new tool to be used in prognostic medicine and therapy planning for patients suffering from a variety of cardiovascular diseases and injuries. In order to have an accurate biomechanical model, personalized parameters to define loading, boundary conditions and mechanical properties are required. Achieving personalized modelling parameters often requires inverse optimization which is computationally expensive; hence techniques to reduce the multivariable complexity are in need. Presented in this paper is the fundamental blueprint to create a library of scar tissue mechanical properties to be used in modelling the healing mechanics of hearts that have suffered acute myocardial infarction. This library can be used to reduce the number of variables necessary to capture the scar tissue mechanical properties down to 1. This single parameter also carries information pertaining to staging of the scar tissue healing, predict its rate, and predict its collagen density. This information can be potentially used as valuable biomarkers to adjust existing or develop new treatment plans for patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".