MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3081745704 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfaa234

The dapagliflozin and prevention of adverse outcomes in chronic kidney disease (DAPA-CKD) trial: baseline characteristics

2020· article· en· W3081745704 on OpenAlexaff
David C. Wheeler, Bergur V. Stefánsson, М. М. Батюшин, Oleksandr Bilchenko, David Z.I. Cherney, Glenn M. Chertow, Walter Douthat, Jamie P. Dwyer, Elizabeth Escudero, Roberto Pecoits‐Filho, Hans Furuland, José Luis Górriz, Tom Greene, Hermann Haller, Fan Fan Hou, Shin‐Wook Kang, Rey Isidto, Dinesh Khullar, Patrick B. Mark, John J.V. McMurray, Naoki Kashihara, Michał Nowicki, Frederik Persson, Ricardo Correa‐Rotter, Peter Rossing, Robert D. Toto, Kausik Umanath, Pham Van Bui, István Wittmann, Magnus Lindberg, C. David Sjöström, Anna Maria Langkilde, Hiddo J.L. Heerspink

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersJanssen PharmaceuticalsDefense Acquisition Program AdministrationSanofi GenzymeMerck Sharp and DohmeSatellite HealthcareAlexion PharmaceuticalsUniversity of GlasgowSteno Diabetes Center CopenhagenMenarini GroupNovo NordiskOmeros CorporationAstellas PharmaCytokineticsFresenius Medical Care North AmericaDaiichi-SankyoReCor MedicalAlnylam PharmaceuticalsServierGilead SciencesNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesSanofiWorld Health OrganizationUltragenyx PharmaceuticalGlaxoSmithKlineAmgenAngionPfizerCSL BehringAstraZenecaEli Lilly and CompanyAkebia TherapeuticsBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsMedicineDapagliflozinKidney diseaseAdverse effectInternal medicineBaseline (sea)Intensive care medicineDiabetes mellitusEndocrinologyType 2 diabetes

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease (DAPA-CKD; NCT03036150) trial was designed to assess the effect of the sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor dapagliflozin on kidney and cardiovascular events in participants with CKD with and without type 2 diabetes (T2D). This analysis reports the baseline characteristics of those recruited, comparing them with those enrolled in other trials. METHODS: In DAPA-CKD, 4304 participants with a urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (UACR) ≥200 mg/g and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between 25 and 75 mL/min/1.73 m2 were randomized to dapagliflozin 10 mg once daily or placebo. Mean eGFR was 43.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 and median UACR was 949 mg/g (108 mg/mmol). RESULTS: Overall, 2906 participants (68%) had a diagnosis of T2D and of these, 396 had CKD ascribed to a cause other than diabetes. The most common causes of CKD after diabetes (n = 2510) were ischaemic/hypertensive nephropathy (n = 687) and chronic glomerulonephritis (n = 695), of which immunoglobulin A nephropathy (n = 270) was the most common. A total of 4174 participants (97%) were receiving an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, 1882 (43.7%) diuretics, 229 (5.3%) mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and 122 (2.8%) glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists. In contrast to the Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation (CREDENCE), the DAPA-CKD trial enrolled participants with CKD due to diabetes and to causes other than diabetes. The mean eGFR of participants in the DAPA-CKD trial was 13.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 lower than in CREDENCE, similar to that in the Finerenone in Reducing Kidney Failure and Disease Progression in DKD (FIDELIO-DKD) trial and the Study Of diabetic Nephropathy with AtRasentan (SONAR). CONCLUSIONS: Participants with a wide range of underlying kidney diseases receiving renin-angiotensin system blocking therapy have been enrolled in the DAPA-CKD trial. The trial will examine the efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in participants with CKD Stages 2-4 and increased albuminuria, with and without T2D.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations190
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicDiabetes Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207