Classic Hodgkin lymphoma post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are often preceded by discordant PTLD subtypes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) is the rarest post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) subtype. Few cases of patients with metachronous discordant PTLD episodes including CHL-PTLD have been reported, but the incidence of and risk factors for this phenomenon are unknown. Patients with CHL-PTLD were identified from an institutional PTLD database. Of 13 patients identified with CHL-PTLD six (46%) had antecedent non-CHL-PTLD: three had polymorphic PTLD, two monomorphic PTLD, and one nondestructive PTLD. Patients with prior metachronous non-CHL-PTLD were younger at transplant and had a longer latency time to CHL-PTLD post-transplant. The prevalence of EBV seronegativity at transplant was high in both groups, but prolonged high-level EBV DNAemia only occurred in some with metachronous non-CHL-PTLD. In conclusion, patients with CHL-PTLD have metachronous non-CHL-PTLD diagnoses with discordant histology more commonly than previously recognized. Primary EBV infection with chronically elevated EBV viral loads may represent unique risk factors for CHL-PTLD following an initial non-CHL-PTLD event.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".