MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3081961069 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.102.024312

Laser-assisted decay spectroscopy for the ground states of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Au</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>180</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>182</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>

2020· article· lv· W3081961069 on OpenAlexaff
R. D. Harding, A. N. Andreyev, A. E. Barzakh, D. Atanasov, J. G. Cubiss, P. Van Duppen, M. Al Monthery, N. Althubiti, B. Andel, S. Antalic, K. Blaum, T. E. Cocolios, T. Day Goodacre, A. de Roubin, G. J. Farooq-Smith, Д. В. Федоров, V. N. Fedosseev, D. A. Fink, L. P. Gaffney, L. Ghys, D. T. Joss, F. Herfurth, M. Huýse, N. Imai, S. Kreim, D. Lunney, K. M. Lynch, V. Manea, B. A. Marsh, Y. Martinez Palenzuela, P. L. Molkanov, D. Neidherr, R. D. Page, A. Pastore, M. Rosenbusch, R. E. Rossel, S. Rothe, L. Schweikhard, M. D. Seliverstov, S. Sels, C. Van Beveren, E. Verstraelen, A. Welker, F. Wienholtz, R. Wolf, Κ. Zuber

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2020
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
FundersHorizon 2020Seventh Framework ProgrammeFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekBelgian Federal Science Policy OfficeAgentúra na Podporu Výskumu a VývojaBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchScience and Technology Facilities CouncilVedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAVEuropean Commission
KeywordsPhysicsHyperfine structureAtomic physicsGround stateSpectroscopyBranching fraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A study of the ground states of the laser-ionized and mass-separated odd-odd isotopes $^{180,182}\mathrm{Au}$ was performed using the Resonance Ionization Laser Ion Source, Windmill detection setup and ISOLTRAP Multi-Reflection Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer at ISOLDE, CERN. A complex fine-structure $\ensuremath{\alpha}$-decay pattern of $^{180}\mathrm{Au}$ was deduced, providing insight into the low-lying levels in the daughter nucleus $^{176}\mathrm{Ir}$. An $\ensuremath{\alpha}$-decay branching ratio of ${b}_{\ensuremath{\alpha}}(^{180}\mathrm{Au})=0.58(10)%$ and a half-life of ${T}_{1/2}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}7.2(5)$ s have also been derived, allowing for the calculation of the reduced $\ensuremath{\alpha}$-decay widths and determining the degree of hindrance of respective $\ensuremath{\alpha}$-decay branches. From complementary first in-source laser spectroscopy measurements of the hyperfine structure in atomic transitions of $^{180,182}\mathrm{Au}$, the nuclear magnetic moments of $\ensuremath{\mu}(^{180}\mathrm{Au})=\ensuremath{-}0.83(9)\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{N}$ and $\ensuremath{\mu}(^{182}\mathrm{Au})=1.66(9)\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{N}$ were extracted with an inclusion of a correction for the hyperfine anomaly. Based on the observed hyperfine structure patterns, and on the comparison of the measured and calculated $\ensuremath{\mu}$ values, a preferred ground-state spin and parity ${I}^{\ensuremath{\pi}}(^{180}\mathrm{Au}^{\mathrm{gs}})=({1}^{+})$ is proposed, and the earlier assignment of ${I}^{\ensuremath{\pi}}(^{182}\mathrm{Au}^{\mathrm{gs}})=({2}^{+})$ is confirmed. For $^{180}\mathrm{Au}$, the most probable proton-neutron Nilsson configuration of $\ensuremath{\pi}3/{2}^{\ensuremath{-}}[532]\ensuremath{\bigotimes}\ensuremath{\nu}5/{2}^{\ensuremath{-}}[512]$ suggests the same proton state as in the heavier deformed odd-odd nuclei $^{182,184}\mathrm{Au}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.834
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.004
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207