Alterations in Cardiac Vagal Modulation-to-Vagal Tone Ratio in response to accumulated exercise stress in intermittent team sport
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Study aim : This investigation examined the cardiac vagal modulation-to-vagal tone ratio and its utility to represent the dose response to accumulated exercise stress in intermittent team sport. Material and methods : Fourteen international calibre female field hockey players training as part of a national team were participants over a three-week period. Exercise stress was expressed through cardiovascular strain using heart rate (HR) dynamics and was quantified as a training load (AU) and time spent exercising above anaerobic threshold (min). Cardiac autonomic activity was examined using heart rate variability; R-R intervals (ms) were collected immediately upon awakening throughout each weekend. The square root of the mean squared differences of successive R–R intervals were individually calculated, and log transformed prior to being averaged (Ln rMSSD) along with the corresponding mean R-R interval length. Multiple linear regression analysis examined the association between cardiac autonomic activity and indices of accumulated exercise stress. Results : Significant inverse associations (95% CI) between the Ln rMSSD:R-R ratio and both training load [ r = –0.48 (–0.70: –0.18), p = 0.012] and time spent exercising above anaerobic threshold [ r = –0.51 (–0.72 : –0.22), p = 0.006] were observed. The association between mean R-R interval length and Ln rMSSD was not significant [ r = 0.05, p = 0.950]. Conclusion : The current study demonstrated high intensity exercise, as defined through time spent above anaerobic threshold, displayed a stronger association with the Ln rMSSD:R-R ratio compared to a HR-derived training load when examining the dose response to accumulated intermittent exercise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it