MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3082077591 · doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119841

Diffusion and fluid interaction in Itrongay pegmatite (Madagascar): Evidence from in situ 40Ar/39Ar dating of gem-quality alkali feldspar and U Pb dating of protogenetic apatite inclusions

2020· article· en· W3082077591 on OpenAlexaff
Daniil V. Popov, Richard Spikings, Stéphane Scaillet, Gary O’Sullivan, David Chew, Eszter Badenszki, J. Stephen Daly, Théodore Razakamanana, Joshua H.F.L. Davies

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Geology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilEuropean Regional Development FundAgence Nationale de la RechercheEquipexSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungUniversity College CorkNational University of IrelandTrinity College DublinUniversity of GalwayUniversity College DublinNational Science FoundationScience Foundation Ireland
KeywordsRadiogenic nuclideGeologyPegmatiteFeldsparGeochemistryAlkali feldsparApatiteThermochronologyMineralogyZirconQuartzPaleontologyMantle (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alkali feldspar 40Ar/39Ar and apatite UPb geochronological studies have typically invoked two mechanisms to account for apparent loss of radiogenic 40Ar and 206-208Pb. Some studies have suggested that the radiogenic isotopes were lost by volume diffusion and used these dates to constrain temporal variations of rock temperatures; others have argued that the radiogenic isotopes were lost due to interaction with fluids and related these dates to chemical alteration. These two end-member interpretations have fundamentally different implications for tectonic models derived from geochronological data, and therefore it is important to reliably identify the principal mechanism for loss of radiogenic isotopes. Here, we revisit the mechanisms of 40Ar loss in the famous gem-quality alkali feldspar from the Itrongay pegmatite in Madagascar. Previous studies have suggested that volume diffusion is the dominant mechanism of 40Ar loss, providing key evidence to support the use of 40Ar/39Ar dating of alkali feldspar for thermochronology. We attempted to verify these results by obtaining time-temperature paths from petrologically characterised cogenetic feldspar and apatite from the Itrongay pegmatite and comparing them with each other. However, our results suggest that only a minor component in the variability of 40Ar/39Ar dates of Itrongay feldspar is related to the diffusive loss of 40Ar, and that this loss was not compatible with the majority of previously proposed models, which hinders quantitative interpretations. The crystal studied here grew in five episodes related to the influx initially of co-existing dense SiO2-rich solution and CO2-dominated fluid (the first and supposedly the following two episodes) and subsequently of H2O-rich fluid (supposedly the final two episodes). Much greater component in the variability of the acquired 40Ar/39Ar dates is interpreted to reflect the differences in the ages of these growth episodes, which we estimate to span from 477 Ma to 176 Ma (the first four episodes). Apatite inclusions in this crystal are interpreted to be xenocrysts derived from the country rocks of the Itrongay pegmatite. These yield older UPb dates than the estimated age of their host feldspar and have apparently experienced diffusive loss of 206,207Pb prior to entrapment. Our 40Ar/39Ar results indicate that there is a lack of unambiguous evidence for diffusive loss of 40Ar from alkali feldspar that can be readily interpreted for thermochronological purposes. However, in situ 40Ar/39Ar dating of alkali feldspar appears to be a promising tool for tracking fluid-flow events in the Earth's crust whose applicability is not restricted to sedimentary rocks. Our UPb results corroborate previous suggestions that UPb dating of apatite can be used for thermochronology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical GeologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207