An anatomical neurovascular study for procedures targeting peri-articular nerves in patients with anterior knee pain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the articular branches innervating the anterior knee capsule has been studied as a possible alternative to surgery for degenerative arthritis. However, the neurovascular topography of the anterior knee capsule remains unclear. METHODS: One leg from each of the 20 formalin-embalmed cadaveric specimens was investigated. Modified ablation points (MAPs) were evaluated for a possible alternative for conventional target points (CAPs). RESULTS: For the nerve to vastus medialis (NVM), the probability of identifying the nerve was higher at MAP compared with CAP (62.5% vs. 25%). The mean shortest distance from the nerve was shorter at MAP compared with CAP (18.0 mm vs. 29.9 mm). The probabilities and distances for other nerves were not significantly different between the points. However, the probability of identifying the artery was significantly lower at MAPs compared with CAPs for arteries (0%, 5.3%, and 0% vs. 84.2%, 84.2%, and 73.3% for superior medial genicular, superior lateral genicular, and inferior medial genicular artery, respectively). For the recurrent peroneal nerve (RPN), a new target point was set in MAPs. CONCLUSIONS: The current landmark for genicular nerve procedures may not accurately target the correct nerve position, or reduce the risk for vessel damage. A more proximal target may reduce complications and increase the probability of successful procedures, although clinical correlation is needed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".