MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3082323043 · doi:10.3390/ijerph17176366

COVID-19 Pandemic: Age-Related Differences in Measures of Stress, Anxiety and Depression in Canada

2020· article· en· W3082323043 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Izu Nwachukwu, Nnamdi Nkire, Reham Shalaby, Marianne Hrabok, Wesley Vuong, April Gusnowski, Shireen Surood, Liana Urichuk, Andrew J. Greenshaw, Vincent I. O. Agyapong

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health ServicesUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
FundersUniversity Hospital FoundationAlberta Children's Hospital FoundationRoyal Alexandra Hospital FoundationAlberta Cancer FoundationMental Health FoundationUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Health Services
KeywordsPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Depression (economics)Anxiety2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)MedicinePsychiatryPsychologyClinical psychologyVirologyInternal medicineDiseaseOutbreak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.144

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.231
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations338
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health→Same topicCOVID-19 and Mental Health→French-language works237,207→