Impact of inter-amoebic phagocytosis on the <i>L. pneumophila</i> growth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Free-living amoebae are known to act as replication niches for the pathogenic bacterium Legionella pneumophila in freshwater environments. However, we previously reported that some strains of the Willaertia magna species are more resistant to L. pneumophila infection and differ in their ability to support its growth. From this observation, we hypothesize that L. pneumophila growth in environment could be partly dependent on the composition of amoebic populations and on the possible interactions between different amoebic species. We tested this hypothesis by studying the growth of L. pneumophila and of a permissive free-living amoeba, Vermamoeba vermiformis (formerly named Hartmannella vermiformis), in co-culture with or without other free-living amoebae (Acanthamoeba castellanii and W. magna). We demonstrate the occurrence of inter-amoebic phagocytosis with A. castellanii and W. magna being able to ingest V. vermiformis infected or not infected with L. pneumophila. We also found that L. pneumophila growth is strongly impacted by the permissiveness of each interactive amoeba demonstrating that L. pneumophila proliferation and spread are controlled, at least in part, by inter-amoebic interactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".