MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3082595084 · doi:10.33137/incite.3.34715

The Student and the Elder

2020· article· en· W3082595084 on OpenAlexaffvenue
SunAMBee Ann Marie Beals

Bibliographic record

Venuein cite journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Critical Thinking Development
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRhythmWhite (mutation)PsychologyPedagogyAestheticsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We love our children.
 We send our children out into the World hoping that they will make it,
 We hope that our children will have a better life. 
 We send our children to the white man’s school so they can get an education to make it,
 We want them to make it,
 We want them to have a better life.
 But we know that the World is not always a welcoming place for our children outside our wombs,
 In the bosom of Mother Earth.
 But…
 We have the rhythm of our words.
 The rhythm of our drums.
 The rhythm of our love.
 We must share with our children the ways of Old.
 We must teach them the rhythms.
 Then, when they go out into the World to make it,
 They hear the rhythms in the beating of their hearts,
 They hold the rhythms in their souls—to guide them when they are far from home in the white man’s world.
 This is a story of teaching the rhythms in a good way.
 This is a story of the sharing our wisdoms, as we have for thousands and thousands of years.
 This is a story to guide our children in the ways of the white man,
 So they can be safe,
 So they can be protected.
 The student is a youth in university.
 The Elder is teaching the youth who believes they have made it because they are learning the ways of the white man.
 The youth is on their way to a better life.
 Yet the youth is troubled.
 The Elder speaks of Old,
 The rhythms of Mother Earth and the Cosmos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.758
Threshold uncertainty score0.420

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuein cite journalSame topicEducation and Critical Thinking DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207