PhenoMIP: High-Throughput Phenotyping of Diverse <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i> Populations via Molecular Inversion Probes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Whether generated within a lab setting or isolated from the wild, variant alleles continue to be an important resource for decoding gene function in model organisms such as Caenorhabditis elegans. With advances in massively parallel sequencing, multiple whole-genome sequenced (WGS) strain collections are now available to the research community. The Million Mutation Project (MMP) for instance, analyzed 2007 N2-derived, mutagenized strains. Individually, each strain averages ∼400 single nucleotide variants amounting to ∼80 protein-coding variants. The effects of these variants, however, remain largely uncharacterized and querying the breadth of these strains for phenotypic changes requires a method amenable to rapid and sensitive high-throughput analysis. Here we present a pooled competitive fitness approach to quantitatively phenotype subpopulations of sequenced collections via molecular inversion probes (PhenoMIP). We phenotyped the relative fitness of 217 mutant strains on multiple food sources and classified these into five categories. We also demonstrate on a subset of these strains, that their fitness defects can be genetically mapped. Overall, our results suggest that approximately 80% of MMP mutant strains may have a decreased fitness relative to the lab reference, N2. The costs of generating this form of analysis through WGS methods would be prohibitive while PhenoMIP analysis in this manner is accomplished at less than one-tenth of projected WGS costs. We propose methods for applying PhenoMIP to a broad range of population selection experiments in a cost-efficient manner that would be useful to the community at large.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".