MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3082653379 · doi:10.1002/rcm.8937

In‐depth gas chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry fragmentation analysis of formestane and evaluation of mass spectral discrimination of isomeric 3‐keto‐4‐ene hydroxy steroids

2020· article· en· W3082653379 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Annette Sophie Kollmeier, Xavier de la Torre, Christian Müller, Francesco Botrè, Maria Kristina Parr

Bibliographic record

VenueRapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal and reproductive studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFreie Universität BerlinWorld Anti-Doping Agency
KeywordsChemistryDerivatizationTandem mass spectrometryMass spectrometryElectron ionizationChromatographyFragmentation (computing)Gas chromatographyMedicinal chemistryIonIonizationOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rationale The aromatase inhibitor formestane (4‐hydroxyandrost‐4‐ene‐3,17‐dione) is included in the World Anti‐Doping Agency's List of Prohibited Substances in Sport. However, it also occurs endogenously as do its 2‐, 6‐ and 11‐hydroxy isomers. The aim of this study is to distinguish the different isomers using gas chromatography/electron ionization mass spectrometry (GC/EI‐MS) for enhanced confidence in detection and selectivity for determination. Methods Established derivatization protocols to introduce [ 2 H 9 ]TMS were followed to generate perdeuterotrimethylsilylated and mixed deuterated derivatives for nine different hydroxy steroids, all with 3‐keto‐4‐ene structure. Formestane was additionally labelled with H 2 18 O to obtain derivatives doubly labelled with [ 2 H 9 ]TMS and 18 O. GC/EI‐MS spectra of labelled and unlabelled TMS derivatives were compared. Proposals for the generation of fragment ions were substantiated by high‐resolution MS (GC/QTOFMS) and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) experiments. Results Subclass‐specific fragment ions include m/z 319 for the 6‐hydroxy and m/z 219 for the 11‐hydroxy compounds. Ions at m/z 415, 356, 341, 313, 269 and 267 were indicative for the 2‐ and 4‐hydroxy compounds. For their discrimination the transition m/z 503 → 269 was selective for formestane. In 2‐, 4‐ and 6‐hydroxy steroids loss of a TMSO radical takes place as cleavage of a TMS‐derived methyl radical and a neutral loss of (CH 3 ) 2 SiO. Further common fragments were also elucidated. Conclusions With the help of stable isotope labelling, the structures of postulated diagnostic fragment ions for the different steroidal subclasses were elucidated. 18 O‐labelling of the other compounds will be addressed in future studies to substantiate the obtained findings. To increase method sensitivity MS 3 may be suitable in future bioanalytical applications requiring discrimination of the 2‐ and 4‐hydroxy compounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRapid Communications in Mass SpectrometrySame topicHormonal and reproductive studiesFrench-language works237,207