MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3082672799 · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17953-4

Wnt activation as a therapeutic strategy in medulloblastoma

2020· article· en· W3082672799 on OpenAlexafffund
Branavan Manoranjan, Chitra Venugopal, David Bakhshinyan, Ashley Adile, Laura M. Richards, Michelle Kameda-Smith, Owen Whitley, Anna Dvorkin‐Gheva, Minomi Subapanditha, Neil Savage, Nazanin Tatari, Dillon McKenna, Blessing Bassey‐Archibong, Neil Winegarden, Robin Hallett, John Provias, Blake Yarascavitch, Olufemi Ajani, Adam Fleming, Gary D. Bader, Trevor J. Pugh, Bradley W. Doble, Sheila K. Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Cells and Metastasis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreInterface Biologics (Canada)University Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Calgary
FundersMach-Gaensslen Foundation of CanadaOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchMcMaster UniversityBrain Tumour Foundation of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlex's Lemonade Stand Foundation for Childhood Cancer
KeywordsWnt signaling pathwayMedulloblastomaContext (archaeology)Cancer researchLRP5BiologyChemistryCell biologySignal transduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Medulloblastoma (MB) is defined by four molecular subgroups (Wnt, Shh, Group 3, Group 4) with Wnt MB having the most favorable prognosis. Since prior reports have illustrated the antitumorigenic role of Wnt activation in Shh MB, we aimed to assess the effects of activated canonical Wnt signaling in Group 3 and 4 MBs. By using primary patient-derived MB brain tumor-initiating cell (BTIC) lines, we characterize differences in the tumor-initiating capacity of Wnt, Group 3, and Group 4 MB. With single cell RNA-seq technology, we demonstrate the presence of rare Wnt-active cells in non-Wnt MBs, which functionally retain the impaired tumorigenic potential of Wnt MB. In treating MB xenografts with a Wnt agonist, we provide a rational therapeutic option in which the protective effects of Wnt-driven MBs may be augmented in Group 3 and 4 MB and thereby support emerging data for a context-dependent tumor suppressive role for Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score0.345

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicCancer Cells and MetastasisFrench-language works237,207