The design of copper‐coating overpack for the high‐level radioactive waste disposal concept in Japan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract For the geological disposal system in Japan, a vitrified waste will be contained in a metal overpack, which, in turn, will be surrounded by a thick bentonite buffer. The overpack is aiming to prevent the contact of groundwater to vitrified waste during the high radioactivity and heat generation period of the first 1,000 years at least after emplacement. Within the Japanese program, consideration for overpack candidate materials has included carbon steel, copper–steel composite, and titanium–steel composite. Within the extensive safety assessment conducted in 2000, steel was selected. This selection was partly based on the manufacturability of carbon steel, as well as its well‐understood corrosion behavior. However, the understanding of copper corrosion and welding/manufacturing technologies have greatly progressed over the past two decades. In this study, we focus on the copper‐coated container developed by the Nuclear Waste Management Organization, because this technology is seemingly effective to maintain very long‐term containment of hundreds of thousands of years, with a low cost of manufacturing within the Canadian program. We are investigating the applicability of the copper‐coating technologies in terms of the corrosion allowance and mechanical design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".