MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3082840309 · doi:10.1097/wno.0000000000001014

Hemorrhagic Intracranial Cavernoma Presenting as a Homonymous Horizontal Sectoranopia

2020· article· en· W3082840309 on OpenAlexaff
Fiona Costello, Yves Starreveld

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuro-Ophthalmology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicVestibular and auditory disorders
Canadian institutionsFoothills Medical CentreUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisual fieldLesionLateral geniculate nucleusAnatomyMedicineGeniculateRetinaNeuroscienceOphthalmologyPsychologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: Hemorrhagic lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) insults are rare but have been reported in association with tumors, vascular malformations, and trauma. The localization of LGN lesions is facilitated by recognition of pathognomonic visual field defects. A 21-year old woman developed a sudden onset painless left homonymous horizontal sectoranopia. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a hemorrhagic cavernous malformation of the right temporal lobe. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and Humphrey perimetry findings localized the lesion to the right LGN. Specifically, OCT testing revealed a right homonymous sectoranopia pattern of hemi-retinal macular ganglion layer-inner plexiform layer (mGCIPL) thinning contralateral to the left sided visual field defect. The OCT pattern reflected retrograde neuroaxonal degeneration from the right LGN lesion. This case highlights a unique pattern of mGCIPL thinning characteristic for a posterior lateral choroidal artery injury, affecting the LGN. These findings illustrate how functional eloquence correlates with topographical elegance in the afferent visual pathway.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuro-OphthalmologySame topicVestibular and auditory disordersFrench-language works237,207