Assisting the Non-invasive Diagnosis of Liver Fibrosis Stages using Machine Learning Methods
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fibrosis is a significant indication of chronic liver diseases often due to hepatitis C Virus. It is becoming a global concern as a result of the rapid increase in the number of HCV infected patients, the high cost and flaws associated with the assessment process of liver fibrosis. This study aims to determine the features that significantly contribute to the identification of the stages of liver fibrosis and to generate rules to assist physicians during the treatment of the patients as a clinically non-invasive approach. Also, the performance of different Multi-layered Perceptron (MLP), Random Forest, and Logistic Regression classifiers are estimated and compared for the full and reduced feature sets. Decision Tree produced 28 rules in contrast with previous research work where 98002 rules had been generated from the same dataset with an accuracy rate of approximately 99.97%. The resulting rules of this study achieved a prediction accuracy for the histological staging of liver fibrosis of 97.45%. Among all the machine learning methods, MLP achieved the highest accuracy rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".