MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Innovación tecnológica para pago de servicios básicos: incidencia en la economía de los habitantes de la ciudad de Quito Ecuador

2019· book-chapter· es· W3082984194 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Héctor Alejandro Paredes, Luis Enrique Barreno Benavides, Marco López-Paredes

Bibliographic record

VenueFondo Editorial Universitario Servando Garcés de la Universidad Politécnica Territorial de Falcón Alonso Gamero / Alianza de Investigadores Internacionales S.A.S. eBooks · 2019
Typebook-chapter
Languagees
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBusiness, Innovation, and Economy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaymentMetropolitan areaPopulationWelfare economicsBusinessMobile paymentQuarter (Canadian coin)GeographyFinanceEconomicsSociologyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The research aims to analyze the economic impact of technological innovation in the payment of basic services in the Metropolitan District of Quito (DMQ), by conducting a descriptive exploratory study, which uses the questionnaire to obtain information as an instrument primary on the form of payment of drinking water, electricity, telephony, and the Internet by random sampling; allowing the statistical analysis in the SPSS program to estimate in dollars the level of family spending in the payment of basic services at the window that considers transportation for mobilization and waiting time, as well as it has been possible to estimate the level of saving of families that Make these payments online, with mobile applications or through direct debit of accounts or credit cards. The research presents its practical implications by demonstrating the need to stimulate the population the use of alternative means of payment of basic services that positively affect the economy of households as a result of the decrease in mobilization, waiting time, and transportation used in window payments; Likewise, it contributes to science by demonstrating the need for more complex studies that show innovation from an analysis of the environments where they are applied, characterizing their users.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFondo Editorial Universitario Servando Garcés de la Universidad Politécnica Territorial de Falcón Alonso Gamero / Alianza de Investigadores Internacionales S.A.S. eBooksSame topicBusiness, Innovation, and EconomyFrench-language works237,207