Spindles insufficiency in sleepwalkers’ deep sleep
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Sleepwalkers have consistently shown N3 sleep discontinuity, especially after sleep deprivation. In healthy subjects, sleep spindles activity has been positively correlated to sleep stability. We aimed to compare spindles density during N3 sleep between sleepwalkers and healthy controls. METHODS: Two cohorts of 10 and 21 adult sleepwalkers respectively controlled with 10 and 18 healthy volunteers underwent one baseline and one recovery sleep recording after 38h (cohort 1) and 25h (cohort 2) of sleep deprivation. For the two recordings, we performed an automatic detection of spindles (11-16Hz) from EEG signal during N3 sleep, restricted to the first sleep cycle and repeated for all cycles. For better interpretation of results, we extended the analysis to N2 sleep and we also measured the density of slow waves oscillation (SWO) (0.5-4Hz) during the same periods. RESULTS: Compared to controls, sleepwalkers showed significantly lower spindle densities during N3 sleep considering the first sleep cycle (both cohorts) or all cycles (cohort 1). SWO densities did not differ (cohort 1) or were lower (cohort 2) for sleepwalkers. The effect of sleep deprivation did not interact with the effect of group on spindles and SWO densities. CONCLUSION: This work suggests that the instability of N3 sleep inherent to sleepwalkers may be underpinned by a specific alteration of spindles activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".