Single Artery Upper Extremity Salvage with Two Free Flap End-to-Side Brachial Artery Anastomoses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background A 36-year-old male was involved in a motor vehicle accident, presenting with a Guistillo's IIIB crush injury to the upper extremity. A severely comminuted ulnar fracture resulted in a 10-cm bone defect with significant overlying soft tissue injury. Methods The injury resulted in a wide zone of injury with inadequate collateral vascularity at the level of the elbow and distal viability dependent on the brachial artery. An osteocutaneous free fibular flap and fasciocutaneous anterolateral thigh flap were used to reconstruct the defect with both flaps anastomosed in an end-to-side fashion to the brachial artery. Results The upper extremity was successfully salvaged, and the patient discharged from hospital at postoperative day 10. Both free flaps survived with no donor or recipient site complications at a follow-up period of 2 years. Conclusion The case illustrates the challenges inherent to significant Guistillo's IIIB injuries with insufficient recipient vessels over a large zone of injury. While performing anastomoses outside the zone of injury is preferred, this case demonstrates the success of performing multiple anastomoses to the brachial artery in an end-to-side fashion within the zone of injury.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".