Sustainable/ Green Product Packaging From the Shoppers Perspective: A Case of Saudi Arabia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Global warming, contamination and climate change are some of the problems that have become an increasingly concerning issue internationally. Buyers' concerns about environmental protection have led to the diversification in consumer buying approach towards a green lifestyle. Therefore, firms are taking action to develop potential ecological strategies in the green market industry. This paper aims to explore and determine the insight of Saudi shoppers regarding sustainable (Green) product packaging to maintain a sustainable and green environment.Material and methods: A sample survey of 232 consumers of Saudi Arabia. Descriptive statistical tools were used, for hypothesis testing, Chi-square test/ Chi-Square Goodness of fit test was applied at Alpha 0.05 with 95% of confidence level.Findings: The result conveys that the knowledge and information towards green product packaging are not favorable, the product labels as a source of information for sustainable packaging considered the primary source for the green product.Conclusion: The marketers, and stakeholders having environmental concern, need to have a great call to the campaign of sustainable/ green product packaging. Besides, it is recommended that the marketer of an eco-friendly product need to consider product labels as a good source of information for sustainable packaging at a priority level.Significance of the study: This research will contribute to the related stakeholders to realize the insight of sustainable (green) products packaging. Besides, it will give a better understanding of consumers' behavior regarding sustainable/ green packaging that will lead to achieving their goals in a suitable approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".