MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3083503482 · doi:10.1007/s10872-020-00561-7

Nutrient and dissolved inorganic carbon variability in the North Pacific

2020· article· en· W3083503482 on OpenAlexaff
Sayaka Yasunaka, Humio Mitsudera, Frank A. Whitney, Shin-ichiro Nakaoka

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Oceanography · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationMinistry of the Environment, Government of Japan
KeywordsSubarctic climateDrawdown (hydrology)Pacific decadal oscillationOceanographyNutrientOcean gyreEnvironmental scienceDissolved organic carbonGeologyAdvectionSilicateSubtropicsSea surface temperatureChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A compilation of surface water nutrient (phosphate, nitrate, and silicate) and partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2) observations from 1961 to 2016 reveals seasonal and interannual variability in the North Pacific. Nutrients and calculated dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) reach maximum concentrations in March and minimum in August. Nutrient and DIC variability is in-phase (anti-phase) with changes in the mixed layer depth (sea surface temperature) north of 30 °N, and it is anti-phase (in-phase) with changes in Chl-a north of 40 °N (in 30 °N–40 °N). Seasonal drawdown of nutrients and DIC is larger toward the northwest and shows a local maximum in the boundary region between the subarctic and subtropics. Stoichiometric ratios of seasonal drawdown show that, compared to nitrate, silicate drawdown is large in the northwestern subarctic including the Bering and Okhotsk seas, and drawdown of carbon is larger toward the south. Net community production in mixed layer from March to July is estimated to be more than 6 gC/m2/mo in the boundary region between the subarctic and subtropics, the western subarctic, the Gulf of Alaska, and the Bering Sea. Nutrient and DIC concentrations vary with the Pacific Decadal Oscillation and the North Pacific Gyre Oscillation which cause changes in horizontal advection and vertical mixing. The DIC trend is positive in all analysis area and large in the western subtropics (> 1.0 μmol/l/yr). Averaged over the analysis area, it is increasing by 0.77 ± 0.03 μmol/l/yr (0.75 ± 0.02 μmol/kg/yr).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.141

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of OceanographySame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207