Genotype–Phenotype Correlation of Tracheal Cartilaginous Sleeves and <i>Fgfr2</i> Mutations in Mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives To characterize tracheal cartilage morphology in mouse models of fibroblast growth factor receptor ( Fgfr2 )‐related craniosynostosis syndromes. To establish relationships between specific Fgfr2 mutations and tracheal cartilaginous sleeve (TCS) phenotypes in these mouse models. Methods Postnatal day 0 knock‐in mouse lines with disease‐specific genetic variations in the Fgfr2 gene ( Fgfr2 C342Y/C342Y , Fgfr2 C342Y/+ , Fgfr2 +/Y394C , Fgfr2 +/S252W , and Fgfr2 +/P253R ) as well as line‐specific controls were utilized. Tracheal cartilage morphology as measured by gross analyses, microcomputed tomography (μCT), and histopathology were compared using Chi‐squared and single‐factor analysis of variance statistical tests. Results A greater proportion of rings per trachea were abnormal in Fgfr2 C342Y/+ tracheas (63%) than Fgfr2 +/S252W (17%), Fgfr2 +/P253R (17%), Fgfr2 +/Y394C (12%), and controls (10%) ( P < .001 for each vs. Fgfr2 C342Y/+ ). TCS segments were found only in Fgfr2 C342Y/C342Y (100%) and Fgfr2 C342Y/+ (72%) tracheas. Cricoid and first‐tracheal ring fusion was noted in all Fgfr2 C342Y/C342Y and 94% of Fgfr2 C342Y/+ samples. The Fgfr2 C342Y/C342Y and Fgfr2 C342Y/+ groups were found to have greater areas and volumes of cartilage than other lines on gross analysis and μCT. Histologic analyses confirmed TCS among the Fgfr2 C342Y/C342Y and Fgfr2 C342Y/+ groups, without appreciable differences in cartilage morphology, cell size, or density; no histologic differences were observed among other Fgfr2 lines compared to controls. Conclusion This study found TCS phenotypes only in the Fgfr2 C342Y mouse lines. These lines also had increased tracheal cartilage compared to other mutant lines and controls. These data support further study of the Fgfr2 mouse lines and the investigation of other Fgfr2 variants to better understand their role in tracheal development and TCS formation. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope , 131:E1349–E1356, 2021
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".