Abstract LB-307: Translational and mechanistic implications of osteosarcoma genomics: A TARGET report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common malignant bone tumor of children and young adults. Although the optimization of combination chemotherapy has led to significantly improved prognosis, survival remains poor for patients with recurrent tumor or metastatic disease at diagnosis. The international TARGET (Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Therapy) OS project team collected 285 clinically annotated samples (age <40 years) for integrative genomics analyses. Eighty-nine cases, the discovery set, were characterized with paired tumor and normal DNA sequencing as well as profiling of transcriptomes, DNA methylation, and miRNA. An additional 196 validation cases were used for copy number analysis and targeted DNA sequencing guided by results from the discovery set. The most frequent recurrent somatic mutations cause loss of function in the tumor suppressors TP53, RB1, CDKN2A, PTEN, and NF1 as well as the chromatin remodeler ATRX. Structural rearrangements are an important mechanism of inactivation for all of these genes. In the discovery set, every case carried at least one mutation of a cell cycle regulator, with TP53 somatically altered in 87/89 cases. Analysis of TP53 mutations suggests that these are often truncal. OS genomes are strikingly complex and contain copy number aberrations (CNA) arising from aneuploidy and extensive structural rearrangements. Transcriptome analysis revealed profound remodeling of gene expression with statistically significant correlation of CNA and gene expression of 3340 genes (FDR<0.001). Regions of high copy number amplification include known therapeutically relevant cancer drivers (e.g. PDGFRA, MYC, CDK4, MDM2, IGF1R, and CCNE1). In contrast, activating mutations of signal transduction genes were rare. With few exceptions (e.g. MYC amplification), mutations or CNA of individual genes were not predictive of outcome. The pattern of significant co-occurrence or mutual exclusion of frequent mutations and amplifications allowed partitioning of 240 cases into four distinct genomic groups. One of these, characterized by relatively simple genomes lacking high copy number amplification, had a more favorable outcome. Unsupervised transcriptome analysis by NMF separated the discovery set into two groups with significantly different outcomes. A pathway-based approach identified a high-risk bone differentiation signature comprised of genes highly correlated with the expression of the osteogenic transcription factors. NMF analysis of DNA methylation and miRNA data also partitioned the discovery set into two groups with the methylation groups significantly correlated with clinical outcome. Our results provide a detailed picture of the genomic complexity and heterogeneity of these tumors that suggests a model wherein most OS are initiated by TP53 loss in a proliferative cell of the osteoblast lineage. TP53 deficiency leads directly to impairment of cell cycle control, DNA repair, and terminal differentiation, a state permissive for the development of secondary CNA and epigenetic changes. The TARGET OS data are publicly available (phs000218) and of immediate relevance to future investigations of the molecular mechanisms driving osteosarcoma. Findings suggest a path forward to improved assessment of risk for individual patients and support a precision medicine approach to future clinical trial development. Citation Format: Paul S. Meltzer, Sean Davis, Jack Zhu, Yonghong Wang, Sven Bilke, Joshua Waterfall, Robert Walker, Marbin Pineda, Yuan Jiang, Sharon Savage, Lisa Mirabello, Tsz-Kwong Man, Aaron Taylor, Monika J. Sun, Jay Wunder, Irene Andrulis, Nalan Gokgoz, Shintaro Iwata, Miki Ohira, Mark Krailo, Don Barkauskas, Lisa Teot, Timothy Triche, Silvia de Toledo, Antonio S. Petrilli, Jaime M. Guidry Auvil, Richard Gorlick, Malcolm A. Smith, Daniela Gerhard, Ching C. Lau. Translational and mechanistic implications of osteosarcoma genomics: A TARGET report [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-307.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".