Experimental Investigation of Condensation of Refrigerants R134a and R12 in Air Cooled Horizontal Condenser
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the phasing out of ozone depleting refrigerants under the Montreal protocol 1987 researches on alternatives to new refrigerants (HFC’s) and (HC ’s) are made to replace refrigerants (CFC) and (HCFC) in air-conditioning and cooling systems that destroy the ozone layer . Most of the refrigerating systems specially the domestic units replaces R12 by R134a, this study make a comparison of performance between the two cycles specially in the condenser where the main difference between R12 and R134a, while in the evaporating where the pressure of the refrigerant determines the evaporator temperature and therefore the cooling capacity of the system ,the two refrigerants are close in behavior. In this study, the experimental results of heat rejected at condenser, coefficient of performance, the experimental condensing heat transfer coefficients of R12 and R134a, in a horizontal copper finned tube with an outer diameter of 10mm are presented at different mass fluxes ,and different ambient air temperatures during condensation under annular flow . A correlation has been developed from the data obtained, the refrigerant side heat transfer coefficients obtained from experimental study is different by 5%-12% from that computed from the correlations developed by Shah , cited in [ 1,2].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".