MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3083697290 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2020-6321

Abstract 6321: BEND3 modulates sensitivity to the UBA1 inhibitor TAK-243 by regulating expression of the multidrug transporter BCRP

2020· article· en· W3083697290 on OpenAlexaff
Samir H. Barghout, Ahmed Aman, Zachary Blatman, Karen Arevalo, Geethu Emily Thomas, Neil MacLean, Xiaoming Wang, Rose Hurren, Troy Ketela, Moustafa Abohawya, Taira Kiyota, Rima Al‐awar, Aaron D. Schimmer

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKnockout mouseBiologyGene knockoutATP-binding cassette transporterUbiquitinAbcg2Cancer researchCell biologyMolecular biologyGeneticsGeneTransporter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract TAK-243 (MLN7243) is a first-in-class inhibitor of the ubiquitin-activating enzyme (UBA1) that catalyzes the first step in the ubiquitylation cascade whereby proteins are tagged with mono- or poly-ubiquitin to induce their degradation or modify their functions. Based on its preclinical efficacy and tolerability, TAK-243 has entered phase 1 clinical trials in advanced malignancies. However, the determinants of sensitivity to TAK-243 remain largely unknown. Therefore, we conducted a positive-selection, genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screen in OCI-AML2 cells followed by selection with lethal TAK-243 concentrations to identify genes essential for TAK-243 action. We identified BEN domain-containing protein 3 (BEND3), a transcriptional repressor and a regulator of chromatin organization, as the top gene whose knockout conferred resistance to TAK-243 (FDR = 0.0012). BEND3-targeting gRNAs were enriched up to 10,000-fold after selection with the drug. To validate the screen results, we independently knocked out BEND3 in OCI-AML2 cells and confirmed the resistance phenotype. In vivo, tumors of BEND3-knockout cells were resistant to TAK243 (20 mg/kg twice weekly) as opposed to control tumors that showed dramatic reductions in tumor growth rate. As assessed by immunoblotting, BEND3 knockout dampened TAK-243 effects on ubiquitylation, proteotoxic stress and DNA damage response. Mechanistically, BEND3 knockout upregulated the ABC efflux transporter breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP; ABCG2), and decreased intracellular levels of TAK-243. It also conferred partial cross-resistance to pevonedistat and TAK-981–related selective inhibitors of the NEDD8-activating enzyme (NAE) and the SUMO-activating enzyme (SAE), respectively, as well as known substrates of BCRP (mitoxantrone and doxorubicin). Finally, TAK-243 sensitivity strongly correlated with BCRP expression in a panel of 30 cancer cell lines of different origin, and chemical inhibition of BCRP but not P-gp sensitized intrinsically resistant high-BCRP cells to TAK-243. Thus, our data demonstrate that BEND3 regulates the expression of BCRP for which TAK-243 is a substrate. Moreover, BCRP expression could serve as a predictor of TAK-243 sensitivity. Citation Format: Samir H. Barghout, Ahmed Aman, Zachary Blatman, Karen Arevalo, Geethu Thomas, Neil MacLean, Xiaoming Wang, Rose Hurren, Troy Ketela, Moustafa Abohawya, Taira Kiyota, Rima Al-Awar, Aaron D. Schimmer. BEND3 modulates sensitivity to the UBA1 inhibitor TAK-243 by regulating expression of the multidrug transporter BCRP [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 6321.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways→French-language works237,207→