Implicating causal brain imaging endophenotypes in Alzheimer’s disease using multivariable IWAS and GWAS summary data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent evidence suggests the existence of many undiscovered heritable brain phenotypes involved in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) pathogenesis. This finding necessitates methods for the discovery of causal brain changes in AD that integrate Magnetic Resonance Imaging measures and genotypic data. However, existing approaches for causal inference in this setting, such as the univariate Imaging Wide Association Study (UV-IWAS), suffer from inconsistent effect estimation and inflated Type I errors in the presence of genetic pleiotropy, the phenomenon in which a variant affects multiple causal intermediate risk phenotypes. In this study, we implement a multivariate extension to the IWAS model, namely MV-IWAS, to consistently estimate and test for the causal effects of multiple brain imaging endophenotypes from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) in the presence of pleiotropic and possibly correlated SNPs. We further extend MV-IWAS to incorporate variant-specific direct effects on AD, analogous to the existing Egger regression Mendelian Randomization approach, which allows for testing of remaining pleiotropy after adjusting for multiple intermediate pathways. We propose a convenient approach for implementing MV-IWAS that solely relies on publicly available GWAS summary data and a reference panel. Through simulations with either individual-level or summary data, we demonstrate the well controlled Type I errors and superior power of MV-IWAS over UV-IWAS in the presence of pleiotropic SNPs. We apply the summary statistic based tests to 1578 heritable imaging derived phenotypes (IDPs) from the UK Biobank. MV-IWAS detected numerous IDPs as possible false positives by UV-IWAS while uncovering many additional causal neuroimaging phenotypes in AD which are strongly supported by the existing literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.043 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".