MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3083740962 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2020-1583

Abstract 1583: The tumor immune microenvironment in early breast cancer progression

2020· article· en· W3083740962 on OpenAlexaff
Alyssa Victoria Francis, Luke McCaffrey

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTumor microenvironmentDuctal carcinomaMass cytometryImmune systemBreast cancerCancer researchCancerTumor progressionPathologyMedicineBiologyImmunologyInternal medicinePhenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), comprising 20% of all breast cancer diagnoses, is a neoplastic proliferation of epithelial cells confined to the luminal compartment of mammary ducts, which precedes invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) formation. Although not all DCIS progresses to IDC, there remains no reliable method to determine which DCIS lesions are most likely to become invasive. Recent studies on paired HER2+ and triple negative DCIS and IDC, indicate biological modulation of the microenvironment as a possible mechanism of progression. In particular, the immune microenvironment plays a crucial role in modulating cancer cell behavior and invasion potential. The role of the immune microenvironment in luminal (ER/PR+, HER2+/-) DCIS progression to IDC has not been well studied, however it is an area of keen interest given that this subtype accounts for 50-65% of all diagnosed breast cancers. To address this gap in knowledge, we employed imaging mass cytometry (IMC) to evaluate the tumor immune microenvironment of co-existing luminal DCIS and IDC in patient tumor samples. IMC allows for the comprehensive analysis of up to 35 different metal-tagged antibodies simultaneously, by coupling laser ablation of the tissue with mass cytometry, while maintaining spatial integrity. Using a panel of epithelial, immune and signaling markers, we characterized the tumor microenvironment of DCIS and IDC tumor components across multiple patient samples, investigating the differences between IDC, DCIS adjacent to IDC, and distant DCIS that is further away from the IDC component, while also controlling for inter-individual heterogeneity. A segmentation mask for each image was generated using a combination of Ilastik, CellProfiler, and ImageJ open source platforms. Single-cell information was extracted and utilized to categorize cells by phenotypes and reconstruct spatial organization maps. Immune phenotype composition, cell-cell interactions, and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were evaluated, and nearest neighbor analysis was performed. In addition to a significant increase in TILs within IDC tumors, we observe a switch towards an immunosuppressed microenvironment between DCIS (both adjacent and distant) and IDC. This is evidenced by an increase in T regulatory cell (Treg) infiltration and Treg-CD8 T cell interactions, as well as a decrease in the proportion of CD8 T cells observed in IDC tumors. Furthermore, there is an increase in T cell infiltration in adjacent DCIS, when compared to both IDC and distant DCIS. This may indicate a more activated immune microenvironment phenotype in these tumors. Results from this novel study will give insight into how the overall immune landscape is reprogrammed during DCIS progression, and may contribute to efforts to better predict early-stage breast cancer progression. Citation Format: Alyssa Victoria Francis, Luke McCaffrey. The tumor immune microenvironment in early breast cancer progression [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 1583.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.288
Threshold uncertainty score0.322

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207