MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3083835685 · doi:10.1002/wer.1454

Indigenous microbial communities in Albertan sediments are capable of anaerobic benzene biodegradation under methanogenic, sulfate‐reducing, nitrate‐reducing, and iron‐reducing redox conditions

2020· article· en· W3083835685 on OpenAlexaffabout
Korris Lee, Ania C. Ulrich

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Environment Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactants
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioremediationEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental remediationMicrocosmNitrateGeobacterSulfate-reducing bacteriaSulfateContext (archaeology)BiodegradationMicrobial population biologyContaminationChemistryEnvironmental scienceEcologyBiologyBacteriaBiofilmOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Alberta is a major center for oil and gas production, and correspondingly harbors hundreds of unresolved contamination sites by environmental hazards such as benzene (C6H6). Due to its cost‐effectiveness, bioremediation has become a promising strategy for C6H6 removal. Contamination sites typically take on an anaerobic context, which complicates the energetics of contamination sites and is a subject that is scarcely broached in studies of Albertan sediments. This study examines the innate potential for indigenous microbial communities in Albertan sediments to remove C6H6 in a multitude of reduced conditions. Community profiles of these sediments were analyzed by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, and removal rates and reaction stoichiometries were observed by gas chromatography and ion chromatography. Organisms belonging to known primary degrader taxa were identified, including Geobacter (iron‐reducing), and Peptococcaceae (nitrate‐reducing). Furthermore, benzene removal patterns of the cultures were similar to those observed in previously reported microcosms, with lag times between 70 and 168 days and removal rates between 3.27 and 12.70 µM/day. Such information could support a more comprehensive survey of Albertan sediment consortia, which may eventually be utilized in informing future remediation efforts in the province. Practitioner points Clay and sand sediments originating from Northern Alberta could remove benzene under methanogenic, sulfate‐reducing, iron‐reducing, and nitrate‐reducing conditions. Degradation profiles were broadly comparable to those of reported cultures from other geographical locales. Key degrader taxa observed included Geobacter (Fe3+‐reducing) and Peptococcaceae ( ‐reducing). Knowledge gained can be the start of a more extensive survey of Albertan sediments. Eventually, this collection of information can be used to generate robust C6H6‐degrading cultures that can be implemented for bioaugmentation and be implemented in informing remediation strategies in soil and water matrices for priority contamination cases such as leaking underground storage tanks and orphan wells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Environment ResearchSame topicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactantsFrench-language works237,207