Geographic Analysis of Variation of Population Scientific Structure in Wasit Governorate for the Period(from 1987 to 2007)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The problem of the research is concerned with the space variation of the scientific structure in Wassit governorate according to the administration units. It suppose that there is a space variation in the scientific structure and growth in the scientific levels for Wassit governorate upon the administrative units level. Its clear that the literacy rate in Wassit Governorate had arrived into the third population. although. It was in continuous decreasing. and less population was for people who had B.H Degrees and higher degrees. Concerning with administrative Units. Al-Kowt quarter was always in the first degree by registering the higher rates for the different educational levels. the reason behind that was many important scientific and schools were found there especially it was represent the center of the governorate. Concerning with what represents the least rates in all scientific level were (Al-Mufaqayah. Al-Ahrar. Shiek Saad and Wassit ) because of the rural tradition which does not give any importance for male education and prevent the females from learning and that was concerning with their needs for learning. however. most of people who have primary degrees work in farming activities. People who have scientific degrees works in mining occupation and trade anesthetics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".