MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3084112454 · doi:10.32393/csme.2020.1162

Electrospinning of Niobium-Tungsten Oxide Nanofibres

2020· article· en· W3084112454 on OpenAlexaff
Oluwagbenga Fatile, Mamoun Medraj, Martin Pugh

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress in Canadian Mechanical Engineering. Volume 3 · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrospinningNiobiumMaterials scienceTungsten oxideTungstenOxideNiobium oxideChemical engineeringNanotechnologyMetallurgyPolymerComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, there is a growing interest in niobium-tungsten oxide nanowires. This material had been reported to possess unique features such as open cavities for storing lithium ions, significant structural stability, and high power density. These deemed this material a very promising electrode candidate for lithium-ion batteries. Over the last few decades, electrospinning has become the most widely used technique for fabricating nanowires due to its low cost, simplicity, high yield, tunable porosity, high surface-tovolume ratio, control over various process parameters, and ability to control the composition of the nanofibers. More interestingly, it is possible to carry out heat treatments on the electrospun nanofibers in order to remove the associated polymer and convert them to nanowires. Also, heat treatments are necessary to improve the surface structure and crystallinity of materials for the Li-ion battery' electrodes. Heat treatments also lead to the creation of longer mean paths for the free electrons which had been reported to enhance electrical conductivity of materials. Previous investigations carried out on niobium-tungsten nanowires show that the material can be annealed at either 930 C or 1000 C. However, the effect of annealing temperature on the diameter and crystallite size of niobium-tungsten oxide nanowires has not yet been established. Hence, this current study focuses on the fabrication and thermal study of niobium-tungsten oxide nanowires annealed at different temperatures (850 C, 900 C, 950 C, 1000 C, and 1050 C) for 8 hours. The structure and morphology of the samples were investigated using X-ray diffraction XRD), Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and Energy Dispersive Spectrometer (EDS). All the diffraction peaks obtained from the XRD can be well indexed to the tetragonal structure phase without traces of extra phases. The results obtained from EDS analysis confirm that the nanowires are composed of tungsten, niobium, and oxygen only. Furthermore, the crystallite size generally increases progressively with increasing annealing temperature; the nanowires annealed at 850 C, 900 C, 950 C, 1000 C, and 1050 C exhibited the crystallite size of 64.94, 67.41, 70.10, 75.15, and 75.06 nm, respectively. The SEM results also reveal that the average diameter of the nanowires decreases with increasing annealing temperature. In addition, the SEM images show that the nanowires appear to be formed by interconnected particles or crystals. According to the very recent literature, the niobium-tungsten nanowires have potential applications in Li-ion batteries, photocatalyst, and gas sensing devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProgress in Canadian Mechanical Engineering. Volume 3Same topicElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207