MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3084144361 · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2020.571696

High Speed AFM and NanoInfrared Spectroscopy Investigation of Aβ1–42 Peptide Variants and Their Interaction With POPC/SM/Chol/GM1 Model Membranes

2020· article· en· W3084144361 on OpenAlexaff
Cécile Feuillie, Éléonore Lambert, Maxime Ewald, Mehdi Azouz, Sarah Henry, Sophie Marsaudon, Christophe Cullin, Sophie Lecomte, Michaël Molinari

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Molecular Biosciences · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMachine Learning in Bioinformatics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
KeywordsPOPCMembraneAtomic force microscopyPeptideForce spectroscopyChemistryBiophysicsSpectroscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)NanotechnologyChromatographyMaterials scienceBiochemistryPhysicsBiologyLipid bilayer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to an ageing population, neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have become a major health issue. In the case of AD, Aβ1-42 peptides, through the formation of senile plaques via their aggregation, have been clearly identified as one of the trigger agents that play a role in memory impairment and other tragic syndromes associated with the disease. Many studies have shown that not only the morphology and structure of Aβ1-42 peptide assembly are playing an important role in the formation of amyloid plaques, but also the interactions between Aβ1-42 and the cellular membrane are crucial regarding the fibrillogenesis and toxicity of the amyloid peptides. Though these studies brought valuable information to the field, questions arise especially concerning the molecular mechanisms involved in AD, which remain elusive and require in-depth investigation at the local scale to clearly decipher the role of the sequence of the amyloid peptides, their secondary structures, their oligomeric state and of their interaction with lipidic membranes. In this original study, through the use of Atomic Force (AFM) related-techniques, high-speed AFM and nanoInfrared AFM, we tried to unravel at the nanoscale the link between aggregation state, structure and interaction with membranes in the amyloid / membrane interaction. Using three mutants of Aβ peptides, L34T, oG37C and WT Aβ1-42 peptides, with differences in morphology, structure and assembly process, as well as model lipidic membranes whose composition and structure allow interactions with the peptides, our AFM study coupling high spatial and temporal resolution and nanoscale structure information clearly evidence a local correlation between the secondary structure of the peptides, their fibrillation kinetics and their interactions with model membranes. The membrane disruption is associated to amyloid species that i) present strong interactions with the membrane, as well as ii) an antiparallel β-sheet secondary structure, and iii) are only transient small oligomeric entities in the early stages of aggregation. The strong interaction between oligomeric species and the membrane in Aβ1-42 toxicity is therefore a therapeutic target to consider.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Molecular BiosciencesSame topicMachine Learning in BioinformaticsFrench-language works237,207