Evidence for the Accumulation of Nonsynonymous Mutations and Favorable Pleiotropic Alleles During Wheat Breeding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Plant breeding leads to the genetic improvement of target traits by selecting a small number of genotypes from among typically large numbers of candidate genotypes after careful evaluation. In this study, we first investigated how mutations at conserved nucleotide sites normally viewed as deleterious, such as nonsynonymous sites, accumulated in a wheat, Triticum aestivum, breeding lineage. By comparing a 150 year old ancestral and modern cultivar, we found recent nucleotide polymorphisms altered amino acids and occurred within conserved genes at frequencies expected in the absence of purifying selection. Mutations that are deleterious in other contexts likely had very small or no effects on target traits within the breeding lineage. Second, we investigated if breeders selected alleles with favorable effects on some traits and unfavorable effects on others and used different alleles to compensate for the latter. An analysis of a segregating population derived from the ancestral and modern parents provided one example of this phenomenon. The recent cultivar contains the Rht-B1b green revolution semi-dwarfing allele and compensatory alleles that reduce its negative effects. However, improvements in traits other than plant height were due to pleiotropic loci with favorable effects on traits and to favorable loci with no detectable pleiotropic effects. Wheat breeding appears to tolerate mutations at conserved nucleotide sites and to only select for alleles with both favorable and unfavorable effects on traits in exceptional situations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".