MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3084258888 · doi:10.5430/ijba.v11n5p29

Impact of Strategic Agility Determinants and Dimensions on Institutional Performance Excellence in Government Institutions in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan

2020· article· en· W3084258888 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Atallah Mohammed Tayser Alsharah

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Business Administration · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicOrganizational Leadership and Management Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcellenceGovernment (linguistics)BusinessStrategic planningCLARITYPopulationPublic relationsMarketingPolitical scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims at investigating the impact of Strategic Agility Determinants and Dimensions on Organizational Performance Excellence in Government Organizations in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. The study population consisted of all department heads or their representatives in Jordanian government organizations and departments affiliated to Prime Ministry according to the approved organizational structure of the state amounting 30 organization and department. Due to population large size, a random sample from these originations was selected. 252 questionnaires were distributed. 226 questionnaires were recollected so the response rate is (89.7%).The study concluded a set of results: the most important is that there is a statistically significant impact of strategic agility determinants and dimensions of (strategic sensitivity, strategic goals selection, and clarity of vision, shared responsibility, core capabilities, and collective commitment) on organizational performance excellence in Jordanian government organizations, The results showed that Jordanian government organizations have clear vision and mission for their future activities and they have clear goals known by all employees to achieve vision and mission. It was found that there is an integration and harmony in setting goals and work procedures among various Jordanian government organizations. The results also showed that Jordanian government organizations do not care much regarding involvement of their employees in strategic planning process, nor are they keen to discuss differentiated ideas and do not encourage creativity and provide suggestions by organizations employees in these. Also the top management in government organizations does not focus heavily on team working in one team spirit, nor does maintain their skilled employees.Finally, the study recommended a set of recommendations, the most important of which is the Jordanian government organizations have to increase their interest in all strategic agility dimensions and determinants due to their great role in achieving organizational performance excellence. And Government organizations should seek to achieve organizational excellence to increase interest in involving their employees in strategic planning process, discuss distinguished ideas, and encourage creativity and submitting proposals by their employees. Also, Team working with one team spirit is main pillar of organizational excellence, therefore it is necessary to increase interesting to and focus on this topic by top management in Jordanian organizations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.171
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Business AdministrationSame topicOrganizational Leadership and Management StrategiesFrench-language works237,207